China's Veto on Maulana Masood Azhar: Unmasking the Geopolitical Game

China's recent decision to block the proposal to designate JEM chief Maulana Masood Azhar as a terrorist at the UN Security Council has sent shockwaves across the international community. It stands as the lone dissenting voice among the 14 other countries that supported this crucial move. While China has couched its veto in technical terms, the underlying reality is deeply concerning.

Here are some key insights into China's motives:

1. Backing Pakistan at Any Cost: China's unwavering support for its all-weather ally, Pakistan, is evident. Pakistan's association with terrorism as a state policy in India is well-documented, and China's stance appears to prioritize this alliance over global efforts to combat terrorism.
2. Leverage on CPEC & OBOR: China may be using this move as a bargaining chip in its negotiations with India regarding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and the One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative. India has expressed concerns over these projects, and China's veto could be a way to exert pressure.
3. Undermining India's Diplomatic Success: India had garnered significant international support following the Pulwama attack to pressurize Pakistan. China's action seems calculated to dent India's diplomatic achievements and weaken its position on this critical issue.

In response to China's political maneuver, Indians have the option to employ an economic tool. We can collectively oppose Chinese business interests in India, regardless of their size relative to our overall trade volume. This could involve boycotting Chinese products and companies, even in cases where they dominate the Indian market. For example, we can reconsider our patronage of Chinese mobile handset makers who profit immensely in one of the world's largest markets. Additionally, we can opt for alternatives to the plethora of cheap Chinese goods flooding our markets, from fireworks to toys.


Taking a stand against such practices requires sacrifice, both for individuals and businesses. As a personal example, I have already taken the initial step by refusing to list our business offerings (B2B and B2C) on Alibaba.com, despite the significant exposure and international transactions it could generate. While profit is important, the nation's interests must take precedence.

The question I pose to you is simple: Where do you stand on this issue, and are you willing to make similar sacrifices to protect our national interests?

"Why Chinese Goods Are Not Welcome in India: Unveiling the Consequences"